Understanding the Aspects of the First Amendment for Freedom of Press/Speech

Understanding the Aspects of the First Amendment for Freedom of Press/Speech

One of the amendments that is covered under the United States Constitution is that of the freedom of speech and press. While it is commonly assumed that this part of the United States Constitution covers any form of price or speech that is not the case. The First Amendment under the United States Constitution allows citizens to have the right of speech and press. Of all the amendment to the United States Constitution this amendment is one of the most debated amendments and is the one that is open to the most interpretation.

Here’s a look at the First Amendment and the different parts of the First Amendment that allow freedom of speech and press. This amendment can be broken up into two sections one looking at the freedom of press and one looking at freedom of speech.

The section pertaining to speech. There is a section in the First Amendment that pertains to the freedom of speech. This part of the amendment gives individuals the right to speak freely in society. The question of whether this part of the amendment refers only to political speech or individual speech is highly contested in the center of many court cases. At the moment when this part of the Constitution is debated is left up to whichever judge the case is brought up to.

The section pertaining to press. The First Amendment also grants freedom of the press. It is believed that this part of the law grants individuals the right to print whatever stories they wish. This section of the United States Constitution is also hotly debated in and is the source of many debates. Journalists and reporters were commonly cite the First Amendment right to freedom of speech when they are protecting their sources are reporting a controversial topic. Many states have started to consider developing a law that allows freedom of speech requires journalists to reveal their sources when it affects the public.

NPR Gives the Public a Voice

2010 11 13 - 0507 - Washington DC - NPR
Image by thisisbossi via Flickr

In an age when everything seems to be commercialized through advertising and marketing, there are few radio stations that have stuck to an independent public-oriented structure. NPR, formerly National Public Radio, has thrived as a non-profit media outlet that champions free speech and free-form radio. They are not affiliated with any religious or political sect, but rather try to appeal to a wide variety of listeners.

The media organization has had its ups and downs since it began in the early 1970′s but has weathered the storm to the tune of millions of listeners daily. Many different types of programs are available to be broadcast on the various stations across the United States of America. They offer news from around the world and commentaries from people in all different walks of life. As a radio station, they strive to inform, as well as entertain, as many listeners as possible.

The company has had its share of accusations of leaning too far to one side or the other on certain issues, but they have persevered through it all. To their credit, you can always expect hard news and information from educated individuals during their programming. Adversity has shown how willing this media outlet is to stick with their guns and not be swayed by political or commercial pressures.

It is sometimes difficult during this era we live in to believe everything you hear, but NPR has a way of presenting information in a very respectful manner. They also have a highly relatable quality, offering callers many opportunities to voice their opinions and debate whatever issues they are discussing. Having a media outlet that is willing to interact with the public is always a refreshing experience. NPR is a company that stands for what the United States was founded upon, free speech and giving people a platform to voice what they believe.

Communication and the Law- The Communications Decency Act

WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 06:  Albert Snyder (2nd L...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife

The law has had implications in communication since the advent of the First Amendment right to free speech. Title V of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 also known as the Communications Decency act was brought into being in an effort to regulate and prohibit activities. It was originally intended as a legislative response to the overwhelming number of obscene sites on the Internet. In fact its main goal was to protect children from pornography on the web. Yet in its enactment the law expanded provisions that caused it to also be applicable to obscene and harassing phone calls as well as to adult content on cable television.

This legislation specifically prohibits obscene or harassing utilization of a wide array of telecommunicative devices including the telephone, cable television programming and the Internet for the purpose transmitting, viewing, or accessing pornography. In relation to cable television, it gave permission for the cable broadcast stations to block access to people that weren’t subscribers, and allowed cable stations to have the right to not carry programs they deemed obscene. It also offered protection to internet service providers from any legal consequences as a result of what other people posted on the web- i.e. third party content.

An individual can be held criminally liable for knowingly transmitting patently offensive, indecent or obscene materials over the Internet. This was a highly controversial act that many felt was the governments attempt to censor internet content- however others felt that it was extremely important to make sure that children could have an safe and enjoyable internet experience and that if in the event a child did encounter obscene material that the ISP itself wasn’t held liable. This was viewed as a very important piece of legislation by ISP’s because it provided them with much needed protection from being sued for content they had no control over.